Our plan to raise funds is modeled on the Bial Foundation of Portugal. This pharmaceutical organization promotes medical research in general. And also sponsors research about extraordinary human capacities. See:
http://www.rdfunding.org.uk/queries/ListCharityDetails.asp?CharityID=914
and

http://www.rdfunding.org.uk/queries/ListGrantDetails.asp?GrantID=2035 .

 

The immediate problem with all of the above is “priming the pump”. Finding operating capital for the first few months, until good cash flow is established. This is hoped to be accomplished via short range *personal* loans. Volunteers for THIS would be appreciated. Note: The description of our plan for the non-profits is not a solicitation. The non-profit solicitations will come in due course, as we become an IRS certified 501(c)(3) organization, and register in the various states where we will solicit...

 

fmri_eeg@yahoo.com

 

Last update: 31 July 2008

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [THUS…]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Dear Senator Escudero:

 

On your web site on the internet, you said:

 

            "Be it strong views or opposing opinions...

              Be it brilliant or outlandish schemes...

              Be it truth seekers or just the plain curious

              All these and more are welcome in my online office."

 

I think this e-mail about proposed charity projects will qualify, on two counts:

 

(1) Brilliant:

It is likely to obtain an eventual *yearly* (directed) infusion of USD 100 million or more into the health care/ education field for the RP. This, for a minimal *one time* start-up cost of about USD 100,000. As time passes, these charitable efforts could surpass the yearly money amounts distributed by the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office.

 

(2) "Outlandish":

It asks that part of the funds connected with the project be used for "Science, Technology & Innovation". This, achieved by establishing a Neuroscience Department at the University of your choice. (UP?). [Other universities would be similarly financed later from rolling funds, with their own Neuroscience Departments.]

It is hoped, that these Departments would accept projects such as brain imaging, for events of the type http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mADlT9FALOs .

[Or, projects of similar nature.]

For: If Science enables Technology, which drives Innovation... [Senator Ed Angara, on wealth creation for nations...]

A civilization that understands "holding objects with fingers" has produced computers. But: Understanding the physiology of the people referred to in the video above [holding objects otherwise], would likely raise productivity via novel technologies.

 

Elaborating on #1... (Brilliant):

 

(a) Senator Roco has abolished double taxation for OFW. The fairness of this move is self evident, but tax revenues were decreased thereby. Fortunately, revenues can be garnered not only by taxation, but by persuasion also. [More of this in a minute...]

 

(b) Having mentioned OFW-s...

Due to the exodus of doctors and nurses "a meager 12 percent of the country’s skilled nurses and 32 percent of doctors are left to treat the sick", locally. [Professor Emmanuel A. Leyco of the Asian Institute of Management, quoted on the internet at one time].

Part of the yearly projected USD 100 million revenues would address this shortfall of health care practitioners, by providing for scholarships to medical doctor and nursing students, given that they would serve in the RP for some years after graduation. Also proposed are subsidies to health workers locally, gifts or loans of medical equipment to hospitals and teaching institutions. (Dialysis machines, MRI, research grade EEG-s... for charitable, education or research usage.)

 

(c) ...The actual brilliant part: Combining taxation, OFW and persuasion.

There are 60,000 pinoy nurses employed in the USA, along with 20,000 Philippine trained doctors.

These people pay taxes to the US government.

A typical nurse earns better than $45,000 yearly, while a non specialist doctor obtains around a $150,000 salary. (Doctor specialist get a quarter of a million dollars or more, yearly.)

These people are subject to the relatively high US tax rates.

FORTUNATELY, the American tax code allows that US taxpayers can donate (redirect) at least 20% of their federal tax obligation, to their USA charity of choice. An American charity can spend its funds abroad, and can seek funds from subpopulations in the US.

Thus, pinoy doctors and nurses in the USA could be asked to assist their countrymen in the Philippine islands, by redirecting part of their American taxes to a charity that would help the health care delivery in the RP.

A charity [relying on persuasion to obtain its revenues], needs to obtain approval of the American Internal Revenue Service and continue to comply with relevant regulations to maintain its IRS Code 501(c)(3) status.

ALL of the proposed use of the funds falls under the definition of charity, as used by the Internal Revenue Service.

***NOTE: In redirecting part of their taxes, the donor's spendable income is unaffected.***

There are two types of charities in the USA: Those that rely on "the general public" (such as doctors/nurses), and "Private Foundations" which operate with a few sources of income [such as corporate, tax deductible donations].

There are many multinational American corporations, with operations in the RP: Texas Instruments, Intell, Wyeth, Pepsi Cola, Dole, (etc). They pay truly HUGE American taxes; 20% of which could be redirected to the charity of their choice.

A quick example of a single US company with operations in the RP: Texas Instruments Inc., year 2006, USA income taxes payable: $282 million.

Since many of these American multinationals (with Philippine operations) believe in CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), persuasion could yield great dividends. The Philippine upper management could petition their American counterpart to assist the host country (RP) by redirecting part of their US federal tax obligation.

These two charitable "fund pipelines" I propose to label The Philippine-American Medical Fund (PAMF, for the private donors) and The Scientific Institute (SI, for the corporate donors).

The former (the Medical Fund), would distribute the scholarships and subsidies in the RP as mentioned before, and use ten percent of its proceeds for pure science research.

The latter (The Scientific Institute), would establish and maintain the academic Neuroscience Department(s) in the RP, complete with the expensive medical/teaching/research equipment that the academic Neuroscience Department(s) would share (for charitable usage), with the health care sector in the RP.

Via US regulations: Not all of the people who plan to be part of these US charities need to be US citizens. (This leaves room for medical school alumni, Fil-Am businessmen, etc., to help with the enterprise on the USA side.)

Inside the RP, the funds collected overseas could be distributed by NGO-s

yet to be established, possibly affiliated with the Lingkod sa Kapwa Pilipino (LINKAPIL) Program of the Commission on Filipinos Overseas of the Executive Department. The Philippine NGO-s could be known as the Philippine-American Medical Fund (Philippines), and the Scientific Institute (Philippines).

 

Continuing with #2... (Outlandish)

 

(a) The originator of these ideas (as you might have garnered), is an American, living in Metro Manila.

 

(b) Having brought up the idea of higher education earlier (albeit in the context of health care), one can generalize and expand on this....

Senator Angara (rightly) believes that STI (Science, Technology & Innovation), is what gives developed countries their advantage in the world. (Thus, research into pure science is not yet another unaffordable luxury, but part of the long range investment strategy of a country.) Neighboring Asian countries that spend on STI reap [delayed] rewards related to their decision.  Establishing (de novo) an academic Neuroscience Department would (at minimum) raise the standing of the Philippine educational system in the eyes of the world. (Also, the concept is likely to be palatable to the high tech US corporations which would form the STI donor base.)

The initial Neuroscience Department (named after: Ed Angara?, Chiz  Escudero?, after the first corporate donor?, after my favorite academic of bygone days who dealt with the "outlandish": Rene Sudre?), would excel in brain imaging research.

It is hoped that the Board of the Philippine-American Medical Fund would accede to the request of its President, that the pure science research that is sponsored would consist of projects, such as brain imaging http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p42JnyypCo0&feature=related ...

Science is, what scientist do.

This area of endeavor would become familiar and ordinary [vs. "outlandish"], as efforts would continue to be directed in this general direction.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Other people that could be contacted as relevant might include:

 

Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago (A friend of the health system, via the Philippine General Hospital: One Senator, One Machine.)

Committee chair persons from the Congress:

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Abaya, Joseph Emilio A.

HEALTH

Pingoy, Arthur

HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION

Villar, Cynthia A.

OVERSEAS WORKERS AFFAIRS

Zamora, Manuel 'Way Kurat' E.

In the Executive Branch:

The Honorable DANTE A. ANG

Commission on Filipinos Overseas

Hon. ESTRELLA F. ALABASTRO

Dept of Science & Technology

Hon. FRANCISCO T. DUQUE III  

Health; PhilHealth

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To actualize these charities, the initial moneys would have to be raised: organizationally and/or privately.

After incorporating on the Philippine side as the NGO-s: The Philippine-American Medical Fund (Philippines) and The Scientific Institute (Philippines), these judicial entities could borrow funds to enable the incorporation and initial start-up operations of their American counterparts.

 

Should you have an interest in the above, your participation in this undertaking would be most welcome.

 

Most gratefully:

Ivan Lay

 

Attached:

Projected Balance sheet "Doctors/Nurses"

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Estimate of yearly: Nurse & Doctor tax $$ recoverable

 

FORMULA…

(# CONTACTED)(% GIVERS)($ TAX)(% DONATABLE) = REVENUES

 

 

Doctors

 

(7,000 of the 20,000)(30%)($39,000 on $150,000)(20%) = $16,380,000

 

 

Nurses:

 

(20,000 of the 65,000)(30%)($13,500 on $50,000)(20%) = $16, 200,000

 

 

Estimated income, for sample year = about 32.5 million US dollars.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Estimate of expenses (USA)

 

 [Full staff; 1 year] vs. [START: 1 employee, 1 month]

 

 

Pay

5 Directors (Board)                                               @$8,000   =     $   40,000

4 Associates (Regional)                                     @$65,000   =     $220,000

1 Supervisor (National)                                       @$70,000   =     $  70,000

1 Compliance/Payroll/Secretary                       @$45,000   =     $  45,000

                                                                                   ____________________

                                                                                                               $375,000

 

Travel,lodging,phone,food,“Payroll  taxes”

 insurance,automobiles,consultants etc.                                   $700,000

 

FULL STAFF ………………………………………………....….. $1,075,000

 

 

 

Single representative; START [SINGLE MONTH]

Registration fees, car, phone, salary, etc. ……………................ $20,000